Retention of Publishing in Sync Library Deals

You’ve poured your heart and soul into your music, dreaming of the day it finds its way into a film, a TV show, or a commercial. But then you start looking into sync licensing, and BAM – you’re hit with a wall of confusing terms and conflicting advice. Especially when everyone starts talking about “publishing.” It feels like understanding differential equations after a long night out.

TL;DR:

• Keeping your publishing rights means you control (and earn from) how your music is used.
• Sync library deals can allow you to retain publishing, but it’s not always a given.
• Negotiating for publishing retention helps you earn more over the long run.
• Don’t be afraid to ask questions and push back if a deal feels off.
• That Pitch helps you get into sync libraries without giving up what’s yours.

What Exactly Is “Publishing” Anyway?

Okay, let’s break down this “publishing” thing, because it’s probably the most misunderstood aspect of music rights. Imagine your song as a delicious cake you’ve baked.

You, the songwriter, are the creator of the cake. The recipe for that cake? That’s your composition – the melody, the lyrics, the arrangement. The unique recording of that cake – the actual, physical cake someone can eat? That’s your master recording.

Now, when we talk about publishing rights, we’re talking about the rights associated with the composition. It’s who owns and controls that recipe. Publishers historically helped songwriters manage their compositions, pitch them for use, collect royalties, and sometimes even advance money.

The person or entity that “owns” or controls the publishing rights dictates things like:

• Who can print sheet music?
• Who gets paid when the song is played on the radio (performance royalties)?
• Who gets paid when the song is streamed (mechanical royalties, a piece of which goes to the publisher)?
• Who can sync license the song for use in a movie or TV show (sync royalties, a piece of which also goes to the publisher)?

In contrast, master rights are the rights to the specific recording of that song. If you’re an independent artist who records and produces your own music, you likely own both the master and the publishing rights initially. This is super powerful!

In the context of the retention of publishing rights in sync library deals, it is essential to understand the broader implications of sync licensing agreements in various media. A related article that delves into the intricacies of synchronization sync licenses, particularly in the realm of platforms like YouTube, can provide valuable insights. For more information on this topic, you can read the article here: Synchronization Sync license and YouTube. This resource highlights the importance of sync licensing in protecting intellectual property, which is a crucial aspect of publishing rights in sync library agreements.

Why Is Retaining Publishing So Important for Sync?

This is where the money is, friend. Seriously. For sync, there are typically two main rights being sync licensed:

1. The Master Use Sync license: This is for the use of the specific recording.
2. The Sync License (or “Composition Sync license”): This is for the use of the underlying song/composition.

Historically, composers and artists would split the sync fee (the initial upfront payment) 50/50 between the master use right holder and the publisher (representing the composition right holder). For example, if a sync library secures a $1,000 sync fee, typically $500 goes to the master owner, and $500 goes to the publisher.

If you own both your master and your publishing, you get both halves! That $1,000 becomes all yours (minus any cut the sync library or licensor takes for their work).

The Long-Term Play: Performance Royalties

But wait, there’s more! Beyond the initial sync fee, every time your music is broadcast on TV, film, or even some digital platforms (depending on territory and sync licensing agreements), it generates performance royalties. These are collected by performing rights organizations (PROs) like ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, or PRS for Music.

• A portion of these performance royalties goes to the performer/songwriter (the “writer’s share”).
• Another portion goes to the publisher (the “publisher’s share”).

If you’ve given away your publishing, you’re missing out on the publisher’s share of these ongoing royalties, which can seriously add up over time, especially if your track is a recurring hit. It’s like discovering a new oil well but only owning half the land.

Sync Library Deals: The Great Publishing Conundrum

This is the sticky part where most artists get confused or, worse, taken advantage of. Some sync libraries, in exchange for representing your music and pitching it to clients, will ask you to:

1. Assign your publishing rights to them entirely. This means they become your sole publisher for those tracks.
2. Co-publish with them. You share publishing ownership with them, usually on a 50/50 basis for the publisher’s share.
3. Grant them an exclusive license to administer your publishing. You retain ownership, but they handle all the sync licensing and collection for a set period.

The “Work for Hire” Trap

Beware of any deal that labels your music “work for hire” or asks you to sign away all your publishing in perpetuity. This is like building someone a beautiful house and then signing a paper saying they own the blueprint and the right to build that house anywhere else without your permission, forever.

• What it means: The person or entity commissioning the work becomes the author and owner of all rights associated with the work.
• Why it’s bad: You lose all control and future income streams from the composition. Seriously, run a mile from these clauses if you can.

The Blanket Agreement: A Common Sync Library Model

Many sync libraries operate under blanket agreements. This means a broadcaster (like a TV network) pays the sync library an annual fee to use any music from their catalog. When your music is used, you get your master fee (if applicable) and your performance royalties (writer’s share).

• If the sync library owns or administers your publishing: They also collect the publisher’s share of those performance royalties.
• If you retain your publishing: You collect both the writer’s and publisher’s share of performance royalties directly from your PRO. This is the goal!

Please read this article for more information on sync licensing contracts with production music libraries.

How to Retain Your Publishing in Sync Library Deals

Successfully navigating sync library deals while keeping your publishing requires clarity and a little backbone.

1. Read the Contract Closely (Seriously, Every Word!)

This cannot be stressed enough. Don’t skim. Don’t assume. Look for terms like:

• “Assignment of Publishing Rights”
• “Work for Hire”
• “Publisher’s Share”
• “Co-Publishing Agreement”
• “Administration Rights”

If you see vague language or something you don’t understand, ask! And if they can’t explain it clearly, that’s a red flag.

2. Understand the Difference Between “Ownership” and “Administration”

• Ownership: You own the recipe (your composition). You control who can use it and how.
• Administration: Someone else handles the paperwork, sync licensing, and royalty collection on your behalf, usually for a fee or a percentage. You still own the recipe, but someone else is running the bakery.

Many respectable sync libraries will ask for exclusive administration rights for a period (e.g., 2-5 years) within specific territories for the tracks you submit. This is generally more acceptable than full ownership assignment, as you retain ultimate control and ownership. They get a percentage of the publisher’s share for their work, but you often still get a higher overall cut than if you assigned publishing outright.

3. Negotiate!

You have leverage, especially if your music is good. If a sync library wants your track, you can often negotiate.

• “Can I retain my publishing?”
• “What percentage of the publisher’s share do you take for administration?”
• “Is there a buy-out clause if I want my music back?”
• “Can we limit this to exclusive administration rights instead of ownership?”

Don’t be afraid to walk away if the terms are not favorable to your long-term career. Your music is valuable.

4. Register Your Songs With Your PRO

Before syncing, make sure your songs are properly registered with your Performing Rights Organization (PRO) like ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, etc. List yourself as both the “writer” and the “publisher” for the publisher’s share. If you don’t have a publishing entity, your PRO can often help you set up a wholly-owned publishing company (often just your name, or a simple DBA). This ensures that you get paid the publisher’s share directly when it’s generated.

In the context of the retention of publishing in sync library deals, it’s essential to consider how various strategies can enhance visibility and access to academic resources. A related article discusses the importance of sync placement in maximizing the reach of published works. By understanding the dynamics of distribution and promotion, sync libraries can better serve their patrons and ensure that valuable content remains accessible. For more insights on this topic, you can read the article on sync placement here.

Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

• Signing Without Reading: The biggest mistake! Always read every single line of a contract.
• Fix: Take your time. Don’t feel pressured. If necessary, hire a music lawyer for an hour to review crucial clauses.
• Assuming All Sync Libraries Are the Same: Some sync libraries are fantastic and artist-friendly; others are predatory.
• Fix: Research sync libraries thoroughly. Look for reviews, ask other artists, and check their track records.
• Giving Up Publishing for a Small Upfront Fee: A quick buck today can mean losing a lot more in the future.
• Fix: Prioritize long-term income streams. The performance royalties from steady sync placements can be substantial. Keep that publisher’s share!
• Not Registering as Your Own Publisher: If you own your publishing but don’t register this with your PRO, that publisher’s share might sit unclaimed or go to someone else.
• Fix: Set up a publishing entity (even if it’s just your name as the sole proprietor) with your PRO and register your songs correctly.

Case in Point: Independent Artist Alex

Alex, a talented indie producer, got an offer from two different sync libraries.

Sync Library A: Offered him a non-exclusive deal, no upfront fee, but allowed him to retain 100% of his master and publishing rights. They would take a 50% split of any sync fees they secured (so if a sync fee was $1,000, Alex got $500 for the master and $500 for publishing after their split, leaving him with $500). They did not take any percentage of the performance royalties. Alex would directly collect 100% of both the writer’s and publisher’s share from his PRO.

Sync Library B: Offered an exclusive deal for 3 years, with a small ($50) upfront “signing bonus” per track. They required Alex to assign 50% of his publishing rights to them, meaning they would co-own the composition. They would also take a 50% cut of the master fee.

Alex initially liked the sound of Sync Library B’s upfront cash. But after doing his homework and speaking to a few peers (perhaps after reading an article like this!), he realized the long-term impact.

• With Sync Library A, if his track got 5 placements that year, each earning $500 in sync fees, and generated $200 in performance royalties (split between writer and publisher), he would earn:
• Sync fees: 5 * ($500 direct from licensor – $500 to sync library) = $0 direct sync fee. Wait, that’s not right. He’d typically get 50% of whatever sync fees the sync library got, so if the sync library secured $1000, he’d get $500 for MASTER. The sync library wouldn’t touch his publishing. This calculation is a bit off in the example.
• Let’s re-frame: Sync Library A takes 50% of the negotiated sync fee. So if a project pays $1000, $500 goes to Sync Library A. The remaining $500 is split between Master ($250) and Publishing ($250). Since Alex controls both Master and Publishing, he receives $500 total, and Sync Library A keeps $500 for their services. This is a 50/50 split on the gross sync fee, which is very common. The key is, Alex’s PRO will still send him 100% of the writer’s and publisher’s performance royalties.
• Total from 5 placements (estimating $1000 sync fee each): 5 * ($500 direct to Alex) = $2,500.
• Performance royalties: 5 * ($200 direct to Alex from PRO for both shares) = $1,000.
• Total for Alex (Sync Library A): $3,500

• With Sync Library B, for the same 5 placements:
• Sync fees: 5 * ($1000 sync fee total). Sync Library B takes 50%. The remaining $500 is split Master/Composition. Alex gets $250 for master. For the composition ($250), Sync Library B owns 50%, so Alex gets only $125.
• Total from 5 placements: 5 * ($250 Master + $125 Composition) = $1,875.
• Performance royalties: 5 * ($200 performance royalties). Sync Library B owns 50% of publishing. So Alex gets 100% of writer’s share ($100) and 50% of publisher’s share ($50), totaling $150 per placement.
• Total performance royalties: 5 * ($150 direct to Alex from PRO) = $750.
• Plus the initial $50 bonus per track for 1 track = $50. (This would apply per track, not per placement, but for simplicity we’ll assume one track got these 5 placements).
• Total for Alex (Sync Library B): $1,875 + $750 + $50 = $2,675

Even with the upfront bonus, Alex would earn significantly less with Sync Library B because they took a perpetual chunk of his publishing and a larger overall cut. He chose Sync Library A, prioritizing long-term control and higher performance royalty earnings.

Key Takeaways

Retaining your publishing isn’t just about ego; it’s about owning your intellectual property and maximizing your income. When approaching sync library deals:

• Prioritize Ownership: Aim to retain 100% of your publishing.
• Understand Terms: If you must concede, aim for exclusive administration, not outright ownership transfer.
• Negotiate: Don’t be afraid to ask for better terms.
• Register: Make sure your PRO knows you’re both the writer and the publisher.

This might all still feel like a lot, but understanding these core concepts will empower you to make smarter decisions about your music and your career. You’re the chef; don’t give away your secret recipe!

Ready to get your music into sync libraries that respect your ownership?

Create a free That Pitch account to distribute your music into real sync libraries and keep 100% of your earnings.

Join Free

FAQs

What is the retention of publishing in sync library deals?

Retention of publishing in sync library deals refers to the ability of sync libraries to retain access to content that they have purchased or subscribed to, even if there are changes in the publisher’s business model or ownership.

Why is retention of publishing important in sync library deals?

Retention of publishing is important in sync library deals because it ensures that sync libraries can continue to provide access to important scholarly and research materials to their patrons, even if there are changes in the publishing landscape.

How do sync libraries negotiate retention of publishing in their deals with publishers?

Sync libraries negotiate retention of publishing by including specific language in their sync licensing agreements with publishers. This language may address issues such as perpetual access, preservation rights, and the ability to transfer content to new platforms.

What are some challenges related to retention of publishing in sync library deals?

Challenges related to retention of publishing in sync library deals may include changes in publisher business models, platform migrations, and the need for ongoing preservation efforts to ensure long-term access to digital content.

What are some strategies for sync libraries to address retention of publishing in their deals?

Sync libraries can address retention of publishing in their deals by advocating for strong preservation and access rights in their sync licensing agreements, participating in collaborative preservation initiatives, and staying informed about changes in the publishing industry.